In my last post, I studied some aspects of Witten Index. Here, I shall probe ways of measuring the WI via integral analysis, as it plays a central role in supersymmetric Yang-Mills quantum theories with saturated and maximal SuSy. In the context of quantum mechanics, to get the path integral formulation from the operator formulation, one discretizes the temporal direction then injects a complete set at each of the time slice:
with ‘a’ being the lattice spacing. So for a bosonic dimensionless lattice field , the path integral measure is
and in the fermionic variables case,
which will allow us to derive and determine the natural-measure for the path integral. In lattice theory, we do no compute the integral nor integrate at all, rather carry an ensemble averages that yield the the ratios of the integration. A relation between the path integral regularized on the lattice and the ensemble averages. The expectation value in the path integral setting is
with the action of the system: note, the denominator above is exactly the Witten partition function which we are after for normalization analysis. The main problem though is that it is impossible to measure the partition function given that it is a ratio and does not depend on the normalization of the path integral. Let’s look at the following though:
with an arbitrary dimensionless parameter. Now, using the measure defined by the following equation:
we get
with . For any real value of , one can determine analytically to give the overall normalization of the path integral while realizing that is given just as an integration defined in (C) above.
The term:
is an ‘observable’ in the integral-measure computation and thus one can obtain the value of the partition function through the following
After integrating out the fermions, we get
and
is an effective action with the kernel of the fermion bilinear, and is the complex phase of .
Hence, the configurations for the ensemble average are generated using the effective action while ignoring the sign factor
Let refer to the ensemble average over these configurations without the sign factor: so, the sign factor ought to be reweighted in the measurement afterwards:
So, to determine the normalization of partition function, we must invert the effect of the sign factor in addition to the contribution from the effective action , thus equation
becomes
where the numerator gives again the integration (C) above.
Hence, we finally get the expression for the Witten index
given that all the fields are imposed the periodic boundary conditions as indicated by the suffix P. Now, with a pseudo fermion, one can rewrite
in the following way: since the definition of the measure gives exactly
with:
So, one can obtain the expression for the Witten index as
with
and
Next, how such WI-measure and integrals play a central role in supersymmetric Yang-Mills quantum theories with saturated and maximal SuSy.