with the M5-brane action in a D = 11 SUGRA background is given as such:
where:
and the -brane action takes the following form:
where:
with:
and where the Hamiltonian metaplectic action in the Heisenberg representation yields:
where:
with:
and:
where the Ramond-Ramond gauge-coupling sector is given by the following action:
and the action of a -brane is given by a Dirac-Born-Infeld part coupled to a Chern-Simons WZ part:
with:
where is the worldvolume pullback with -orientifold action:
with:
and
where the pullback to the -worldvolume yields the 10-D SYM action:
with string coupling:
and the 10-D SUGRA dimensionally-reduced Type-IIB action is given as such:
with:
In the string-frame, the type-IIB SUGRA action is given by:
with:
where the superpotential is given by:
where:
is the Gukov-Vafa-Witten superpotential stabilization complex term, as well as the axio-dilaton field:
Given the presence of -brane instantons, are of Kähler moduli Type-IIB-orbifold class:
with being the volume of the divisor and the 4-form Ramond-Ramond axion field corresponding to:
and:
where is the Kähler form:
and:
an integral-form basis and the associated intersection coefficients. Hence, the desired Kähler potential is given as such:
with the Calabi-Yau volume, and in the Einstein frame, has the following form:
The -term is given by:
with the large volume scenario -term given as such:
with:
and the Fayet-Illopoulos terms being:
where are the -brane charge-vectors. Then we saw that the Chern-Simons orientifold action gets a Calabi-Yau curvature correction in the form of:
with
due to the Gauss–Codazzi equations:
and the Ramond-Ramond term being:
which yields the Type-IIB Calabi-Yau three-fold superpotential:
with the topologically mixed Yang-Mills action taking the following form:
with the corresponding Chern-Simons action:
It follows that the equation of motion for an M5-brane, in the abelian case, is given as such:
with:
and are clearly invariant under SUSY transformations:
the worldvolume metric is hence given by:
and asymptotes as such:
Now, in light of the self-duality of the curvature form, a Killing spinor satisfying:
exists. Since the bosonic solutions to the Euler-Lagrange equations preserve eight supersymmetries, we have the following relation:
In light-cone gauge, we hence have:
Thus, the Euler-Lagrange equations satisfying eight supersymmetries are:
On the multi-centered Taub-NUT space, the 2-form is given as such:
with:
Hence, the fermionic Euler-Lagrange equations are given by:
The energy-momentum tensor for scalars and fermions is given as such:
with the super-Poincaré operator given by:
Hence, the abelian conserved current takes the following form:
for all 1-forms derived from the gauge symmetry corresponding to the Hermitian Yang-Mills equations, with total charge:
Restricting to , asymptotically we get:
and where the D4-brane gauge field is given as such:
In the non-abelian case, the M5-brane compactified on a circle of radius R yields at low energy a 5D M-SYM. An elliptic multi-centered Taub-NUT reduction on imposes the following metric:
with Yang-Mills action:
and the scalar action:
and our Chern-Simons term is hence given by:
We can now analyze the M5-brane from the perspective of the D3/D5-brane configuration system. The Killing spinor equation in such a system is given as such:
with SUSY-variation:
and field strength:
The covariant derivative is hence given in terms of a field transforming in the adjoint representation of the gauge group:
and the BPS conditions are given by:
Hence, we can derive:
from which the Euler-Lagrange equations follow as such:
In light of the BPS conditions:
it follows that, up to metaplecticomorphism, solutions to the BPS equation are gauge transformations of configuration type:
Hence, the Euler-Lagrange equations are given by:
with:
Our Yang-Mills form is thus given by:
Hence, becomes an element of the full M5-brane gauge algebra given that the following identity holds:
The fermionic Euler-Lagrange equation is given by:
the second being the Dirac equation for:
and the D-term in the first equation is the only source of the non-abelian gauge field. Hence we have, in terms of a representation highest weight term member , the following equation:
Consequently, the following can be derived:
The energy-momentum tensor is thus given as such:
and entails:
and so the energy-momentum tensor reduces to the following form:
giving us the spacial integral relation:
corresponding to copies of multi-centered Taub-NUT spaces of a Wess–Zumino–Witten–Novikov model for each , and crucially, the non-abelian gauge charges for our M5-brane action take the following form:
with corresponding charges:
Thus, the action of our BPS sector yields the desired result: a Wess–Zumino–Witten–Novikov model for a multi-centered Taub-NUT space directly arising from M-theory: