Nature is a mutable cloud, which is always and never the same. ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson!
Where there is life there is a pattern, and where there is a pattern there is mathematics. Once that germ of rationality and order exists to turn a chaos into a cosmos, then so does mathematics. There could not be a non-mathematical Universe containing living observers.
John D. Barrow, The Artful Universe (1995)
I last derived the D3-brane effective action in the NS5-brane geometry, via the D3-brane self-duality and Poincaré invariance properties as such:
with
being the D3-brane tension, and , are the RR-4 and RR-2 exterior forms. In order for the effective action to be integrable with fields in 2nd-quantized form, one must work under the Gaillard-Zumino Condition: that is – using 8-loop counterterms with superspace torsion
where is the superfield torsion. One starts with a Lagrangian
in D = 4, with a dependence on a gauge field strength , metric , and matter field : so, we now have
, and the Hodge dual components for the tensor are given by
The Gaillard-Zumino Condition now is fundamentally an infinitesimal duality transformation of and and matter transformation given by
Now, the Lagrangian must transform as
and one has a transformation given by , , and so the Lagrangian is given by
and by D3-brane self-duality, it follows that
Now we are in a position to analyse the D3-brane action, and for simplicity but with no loss of information, without scalar supergravity backgrounds. Let be a bosonic brane coordinatization in D = 10 flat target bulk space and its fermionic partner given by the Majorana-Weyl spinor index with N = 2 SuSy index . The D3 action for the brane coordinates and worldvolume gauge field must have Kappa symmetry and we require N = 2 SuSy: So,
where
with being the Pauli matrices and act on the N = 2 SuSy indices. The 1-form defined by
and
By use of exterior differential forms on the bulk, with an RR pull-back 2-form and 4-form , we get
and
and is given by
with . To check whether the Gaillard-Zumino Condition is met, we must calculate the first 2 terms of the condition:
so, is given by
where I have made an explicit use of the determinant formula for the four-by-four matrix
and by the Hodge duality, can be derived as
and by the GKP-Witten relation for the D3-brane action
one gets
and by conjugation, one derives the essential identity
A few remarks are in order now on the bosonic truncation of the D3-brane action. Note in the above equation, the right-hand-side vanishes completely, and so the Lagrangian transforms accordingly as
The supersymmetry situation under the Gaillard-Zumino Condition can now be considered for the matter field contributions. For a D3-brane, the matter fields transform as
and hence we get
while noting that the Majorana-Weyl fermions: and transform as group doublet and the gauge variation of the total Lagrangian with respect to matter fields transforms as
where is the Hodge dual of , with
and the Poincaré invariance of D3-branes transfers to and induces a relation on the differential forms
Combining the last 3 equations, we get
And so the D3-brane self-duality and Poincaré invariance are satisfied by the Gaillard-Zumino Condition. To second-quantize the D3-brane action, one must lift the duality by an introduction of a dilaton and axion living on constant background fields on the bulk space. The redefined Lagrangian, via D3-brane 4-dimensional worldvolume topological tori-throating becomes
and by such tori redefinition, we obtain
Next, I should work in the Hamiltonian framework to bring to light some deep issues in brane-dynamics.
Mathematics is not contained in its formulae, but ‘in’ the mental pauses the mathematician takes between thinking about them.